Dr. Andrei Dmitrievich Sakharov |
Anyhow, a few weeks ago I ended my “Descartes” post by relating that he was a hippie. Indeed, this is not all my suite had to say. Apparently, my friend sees Descartes as an “old fool”; he remained our topic of conversation for a few nights. The Elder came to the conclusion that Descartes’ argument for what was knowledge and true (e.g. that he existed not as a physical being, but as a mind) was circular. Descartes deduced that what he perceived, and consequently “knew”, had to be true since God would not allow him to be deceived; God is infinitely good and would not allow any harm to come to anyone. Descartes did not have a valid, deductive argument for the existence of God, instead, he posited that God exists because he exists, period. My suitemate asserted Descartes would fit in nicely with today’s religious extremists; “perhaps he’d be the pastor of a mega-church”, he said. In the end, my old pal shred to pieces Descartes’ book on Epistemology.
The air seems to be filled with woe and misery as I type the final words of the post that will finalize this blog (perhaps, a sorrowful air comparable to the wretchedness of this past hollow’s eve). It’s been a grand time everyone, I hope the blog was enjoyable!
Dr. Andrei Dmitrievich Sakharov by dbking is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
Based on a work at www.everystockphoto.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment